Monday, 17 February 2014

Euripides' Bacchae: The Agony and the Ecstasy



Euripides' Bacchae: The Agony and the Ecstasy

How does Euripides depict the extremes of ecstasy in this play? What is the price that has to be paid for this ecstasy? Is Euripides suggesting that this price is ultimately too high?

The Bacchae is a grotesque, complex and magnificent exploration of the human condition. Through the suffering of the young king Pentheus and his mother Agave, Euripides challenges his audience to question the practices, the underlying principles, and, indeed, the system of belief that a society is founded upon. On a different level, however, the Bacchae also demonstrates the effect of these social constructs upon the individual. Ultimately, for Euripides, the interaction of these two elements is the proper subject of tragedy. The Bacchae, it will be argued, is a play about emotional extremes. In the first instance it is the extremes of rationality, of civilization and of repression, and in the second, it is the extremes of ecstasy, which, for Euripides, necessarily follow from the first. Both Agave and Pentheus are guilty of these extremes, and both suffer for them.

This essay, then, will outline these emotional extremes and the way they are depicted. This will be done, firstly, by demonstrating the extremity of Pentheus’ position in the opening third of the play.  Secondly, the extremes of ecstasy will be illustrated by using a comparison between the description of Bacchic revelries by the Asiatic chorus, and the description of the ecstatic frenzy of the Theban Bacchae, as described by the two messengers. Euripides’ use of these extremes and their consequences will then be analyzed. It will be argued that Euripides uses a complex symbolic system to show that the enormous price paid for such extremes is not only too high, but, in fact, fundamentally undermines society, which, of necessity, leads to violent and inhuman consequences. 

When Pentheus first hears news of the Theban women leaving the city to engage in “strange new evils,”[1] he reacts swiftly. His focus is on a perceived sexual threat that The Stranger and the corrupted Theban women represent; he aims at the suppression of the revelries, by containing the women[2] and destroying The Stranger[3]. Pentheus’ reaction is, for a king, ostensibly reasonable[4]. He intends to restore order to a city that has, no doubt, been substantially disrupted by the actions of the women, who have “abandoned their homes”[5]. However, his reaction is also marked by anger towards and ridicule of those whom he considers, “devoid of common sense” [6]. His position may well have been defensible, as Norwood suggests, but for its extremity. This point is emphasized by Cadmus, who, despite his comical appearance, takes a pragmatic position. Cadmus’ is not an emotive or ecstatic appeal to Pentheus to join the Bacchic revelries but is, instead, a prophetic warning to Pentheus, which is met once again with a reaction that might be reasonable but for its extremity[7].

The excesses of Pentheus’ position find their source in his own make up. His obsessive focus on the sexual element[8] of the Bacchae and the Stranger indicates that below the surface of this rational young king resides a dormant emotional and instinctive temperament, which the arrival of The Stranger has awoken. When the two finally meet, Pentheus accuses the now “shapely”[9] Stranger of attempting to sexually corrupt Thebes, but then, instead of meeting out the appropriate punishment, engages with him, asking him questions about the cult of Dionysius. It is clear that Pentheus has moved from a state of anger to curiosity. Interestingly, when Pentheus does finally punish The Stranger, he decides to lock him up—contain him—with the women, a far cry from cutting “his head right off his body!”[10].

The immediate reaction by Pentheus to the cult of Dionysius has already begun to be reversed. Initially, he is represented as “a puritan with a puritant mind”[11], whose effort to contain the Theban women and the Stranger is indicative of an attempt “to repress the elemental,”[12] within his own nature. His endeavor to contain the threat within the palace, followed by the collapse of the palace, can be viewed as the symbolic representation of this process[13]. The failure of this containment results in the collapse of Pentheus psyche or “the sudden complete collapse of the inward dykes when the elemental breaks through perforce and civilization vanishes”[14]. Although Pentheus makes several attempts at regaining his former condition, for example by trying “to stab,” Dionysius’ “shining image”[15] and by making another attempt to contain the stranger by locking “every gate in the encircling rampart,”[16] the process of complete disintegration has begun, with these pathetic attempts serving only to highlight the futility of his position and the tragedy of his fate.

It can be argued that a similar phenomenon is at work with regard to the Theban Bacchae. Their initial refusal to accept Dionysius has led them to an altered and ecstatic condition as expressed in their frenetic revelries, the extremity of which will now be examined. It can be argued that this process is given greater emphasis because of the comparative peacefulness of the idealized revelry described by the Asiatic chorus, which will now be briefly outlined.

The Asiatic chorus describes key elements of Bacchic ritual, including the clothing worn, such as ivy crowns and fawnskins, the objects used, such as the thyrsus, and the activities participated in, including the playing of instruments and dancing, and the slaughter of animals and feasting. It can be argued that this represents a formal and controlled revelry[17], the overall impression of which, is an unusual yet beautiful, naturalistic and joyous scene[18]. Additionally, there is an emphasis on femininity and fertility:

Swiftly rejoicing, then,
Like a filly grazing with her mother,
The Bacchant leaps
Swift and nimble on her feet.[19]

This scene offers a stark contrast with the “strange feats,”[20] of the Theban Bacchae.

Two messengers present the narrative of the Theban Bacchae to the audience, which represents the first significant difference between them and the Asiatic chorus, who present their own version of events. Importantly, this means that, whereas the Asiatic revelries would have been sung, the description of the Theban women would have been spoken, creating a clear distinction between the two and allowing for a “vivid narration of violent and shocking events”[21].

Beyond this formal element, the differences between the two Bacchae are many.
For example, the Asiatic choir mentions their revelries within the context of “biennial festivals,” [22] which implies that they are nocturnal[23].  The Theban women, by contrast, begin their revelries “as the sun lets loose its rays”[24]. These revelries constitute a wild Bacchic frenzy, occurring in broad daylight, which become progressively more violent and shocking.  The maternal images of the Asiatic choir are inverted, firstly, by the description of the Theban women breast-feeding “fawn or wild wolf cubs”[25] and then by their snatching “children from their homes”[26]. Significantly, the women are likened to “enemy soldiers,” “turning it all upside down,”[27] a direct allusion to the inversion occurring here. While such practices may have formed part of actual Bacchic revelries, it can be argued that their inclusion by Euripides in a tragedy to be performed in Athens, means that their intended effect was to shock, or, at the least deeply concern the audience[28].

If the reports of the first messenger failed to shock, the progression of the Theban women toward ecstatic madness, as described by the second messenger, cannot have failed in this endevour. The second messenger describes in vivid detail the dismemberment of the king, the predominant image of which is the ripping and tearing apart of Pentheus by the Theban women, which of course includes his mother and aunts[29]. Agave is described as “foaming from the mouth and rolling her protruding eyeballs,” and, like Pentheus earlier in the play “not thinking what she ought to think”[30].  What is depicted here is “the blind force of instinct, the primal spirit of chaos,”[31] the progressive and complete loss of control by the Theban women.

The two emotional conditions analyzed here represent the polar extremities of the human condition. Euripides employs a complex symbolic system in order to display these conditions and their dangers. The young king, as we first meet him, represents the extremes of civilization, of the polis. As Espositio explains, the city, in “the Greek imagination,” represents “order, wisdom, sanity, culture … morality, religion and politics”. This is the set of values that drives the king to act swiftly and resolutely to contain the public disturbance of the Bacchae and The Stranger; in brief, this is the “traditional male warrior code”[32].  However, it is the extremity of this position, the absolute rigidity of such an ethos, that leads to the king’s demise, through the agency of Dionysius.


Equally, Agave, her sisters, and the rest of the Theban women, may have fallen victim to such a position; this we cannot know as it occurs before the action. All
we are told is that the Theban women “denied that I, Dionysius, was begotten from Zeus,”[33]. What we are shown is the danger of embracing “the wilderness of the mountain,” and all it represents, to the degree that these women do; “the song, dance, ecstasy … madness, disorder,”[34] of the Bacchae, the outward expression of primal energy, which, though it has its place, and may even serve a vital social function, when taken to the extreme, leads to inhumane consequences. The perversion of the women could not be described in more shocking terms, it is their maternal and familial bonds that are destroyed. Once again it is through the agency of Dionysius that the women are driven to these extremes.

What, then, are we to make of Euripides’ Dionysius, whose omnipotence in the Bacchae is especially baffling if we credit Lima[35] with accuracy when he asserts that Euripides was in fact an atheist.

Perhaps, in this regard, it is useful to consider Dionysius himself as part of Euripides’ symbolic system.  In the Bacchae, Dionysius can be viewed as a representation of those wilder elements of the human psyche that he is most often associated with—those elements that Pentheus, with his rationalist, civilized, warrior code, sought to contain, to build walls around, to repress[36]. Indeed, this thesis is given weight by the doubling that occurs throughout the drama between Pentheus and Dionysius (as the Stranger), who are cousins of a similar age, from the same city, who in many ways collude throughout the play; there is both a mirroring and a symbolic unity between the two.

 This symbolic reading of Dionysius implies that the play is a narrative about the self and the effect of civilization upon the individual. This reading gives new and prophetic resonance to the last words of the second messenger when he opines, “moderation and reverence for things divine is the best course. And it is also, I think, the wisest possession for those mortals who use it.”[37] Perhaps Euripides means to encourage his viewers to pay due reverence to themselves, to all the parts of their psyche, in moderation; and to encourage a society to offer a moderate and controlled outlet for all of its members to express themselves and to not simply privilege the powerful and their rigid ethos. It seems that such a didactic purpose is a likely explanation for a drama such as this, written by an aging poet, living in exile from a homeland emerging from the ravages of thirty years of excess.





 Reference List

Primary Sources

Euripides, Bacchae, Euripides: Four Plays Medea, Hippolytus, Heracles, Bacchae, ed. and transl. S. Esposito, Newburyport MA: Focus Publishing (2004).

Secondary Sources

Dodds, E, R, ‘Maenadism in the Bacchae’, The Harvard Theological Review 33 03 (1940) 155-176.

Esposito, S, Introduction to Euripides: Four Plays Medea, Hippolytus, Heracles, Bacchae, in Esposito, S, Euripides: Four Plays Medea, Hippolytus, Heracles, Bacchae, Newburyport MA: Focus Publishing (2004) 01-34.

Grube, G, M, A, ‘Dionysius in the Bacchae’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 66 (1935) 37-54.

Kraemer, R, S, ‘The attraction of Women to the Cult of Dionysius’, The Harvard Theological Review 72 01/02 (1979) 55-80.

LaRue, J, A, ‘Prurience Uncovered: The Psychology of Euripides’ Pentheus’, The Classical Journal 63 05 (1968) 209-214.

Lima, R, ‘The Primal Spirit: Sacred Frenzy in Euripides’ Bacchae’, in Stages of Evil: Occultism in Western Theatre and Drama, Lexington: University of Kentucky (2005) 101-115.

Norwood, G, The Riddle of the Bacchae: The Last Stage of Euripides’ Religious Views, Manchester: University of Manchester Press (1908).

Shein, S, L, Introduction to Sophokles: Philoktetes, in Shein, S, L, Sophokles: Philoktetes, Newburyport MA: Focus Publishing (2003) 1-18.




[1] Bacchae, 216
[2] Bacchae, 226, 231
[3] Bacchae, 241, 245, 356
[4] Norwood, 1908, 60, for example, argues that there is “nothing whatever objectionable in his attitude”.
[5] Bacchae, 217
[6] Bacchae, 252
[7] Bacchae, 343
[8] LaRue, 1968, 209, claims that Pentheus possesses a “morbid sexual curiosity”.
[9] Bacchae, 454
[10] Bacchae, 241
[11] Grube,1935, 40
[12] Dodds, 1940, 159
[13] Seeing the palace collapse as largely symbolic, while still problematic, helps to address Norwood’s pertinent concerns about this scene, without resorting to his questionable conclusions, see Norwood, 1908, 37-48
[14] Dodds, 1940, 159
[15] Bacchae, 631
[16] Bacchae, 653
[17] Kraemer, 1979, 80, argues that Dionysiac possession allowed women to “temporarily defy their normal roles” within a structured framework.
[18] Grube,1935, 39.
[19] Bacchae, 166-169
[20] Bacchae, 667
[21] Schein, 2003, 08
[22] Bacchae, 133
[23] Kraemer, 1979, 60
[24] Bacchae, 679
[25] Bacchae, 699
[26] Bacchae, 754
[27] Bacchae, 753-754
[28] Dodds, 1940, 174
[29] Bacchae, 1127, 1130, 1135
[30] Bacchae, 1122-1123
[31] Lima, 2005, 112
[32] Esposito, 2004, 19
[33] Bacchae, 27
[34] Esposito, 2004, 19
[35] Lima, 2005, 103
[36] LaRue, 1968, 212, writes “Dionysius is merely the symbol of the savage bestial side of Penthues’ own psyche”.
[37] Bacchae, 1150-1152

No comments:

Post a Comment